Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Swackhamer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1978No. 10650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*601OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

At issue is the constitutionality of chapter 174, 1977 Nev. Stats., which requires the submission of an advisory question to the registered voters of this state on the ratification of the proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States commonly known as the equal rights amendment. It is asserted that the chapter violates article V of the federal constitution. The district court found no constitutional infirmity. For reasons hereafter expressed we agree with that court and, therefore, affirm the judgment entered below.

The advisory question to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leser v. GarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Fletcher v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Dyer v. BlairDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  5. Walker v. DunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Brant v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 364Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. City of Reno v. Citizens for Cold SpringsNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Bramberg v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API