Legal Opinion
Richard Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment Committee
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 4, 2014No. 13-1360PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DIAZ joined. Judge WILKINSON wrote a dissenting opinion.
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company *351and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. (collectively “RJR”). Richard Tatum brought this suit on behalf of himself and other participants in RJR’s 401(k) retirement savings plan (collectively “the participants”). He alleges that RJR breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Sacerdote v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Jennifer Sweda v. University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Brotherston v. Putnam InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Pfeil v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.