Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. LeBlanc

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1989No. C-8390PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of divorce. The court of appeals has reversed the property division and remanded the cause for a new division. 761 S.W.2d 450. Among other things, husband has argued the application of Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939), to the judgment of the trial court. Craddock sets forth the traditional elements of proof required to obtain a new trial following a default judgment. Id. 133 S.W.2d at 126.

The court of appeals concluded that Craddock had no application to the present case because it was tried on the merits, rather than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. in the Interest of M.V.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  3. Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Hatzlachh Supply, Inc. v. Moishe's Electronics Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. In the Interest of K.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API