Legal Opinion

Carter v. Bogden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1926No. 6888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is assumed for the purpose of this case that, no statute forbidding, and all stockholders agreeing thereto, and no equitable rights of other creditors intervening, the corporation, in assuming or agreeing to pay the indebtedness of the stockholders Weston and Hansen to appellant, same being a valid indebtedness as between said parties, would be bound thereby. 1 Cook on Corporations (8th Ed.) § 3, par. 16. However, will appellant be permitted in bankruptey, which is a court of equity, administering the law according to its spirit rather than its strict…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. McLellan v. Detroit File WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Scott v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Du Vivier & Co. v. GalliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stirling Homex Corporation v. RaichleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Goldie v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Jezarian v. RaichleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. American Bank Trust Shares, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
  5. In re Lico Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API