Legal Opinion

Nagel v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 653

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2019No. 0:18-cv-01053Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Matthew Nagel, individually and on behalf Case No. 18-cv-1053 (WMW/ECW) of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 653, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (Dkt. 14.) Plaintiff Matthew Nagel asserts claims against Defendant United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 653 (Local 653), for breach of the duty of fair representation and violation of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API