Legal Opinion

Hale v. Mothershed

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 22, 1986No. 9490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Appellants challenge a district court order reinstating appellees’ case after it had been dismissed for want of prosecution. Although we agree that the reinstatement order is void because it was entered after the district court lost jurisdiction, we find that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this attack on it, and accordingly dismiss the appeal.

On November 26, 1985, the district court of Cass County dismissed appellees’ suit for want of prosecution. A motion to reinstate the cause was filed on December 26, 1985, and a hearing was held on January 10, 1986. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. N-S-W Corp. v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Henderson v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Danforth Memorial Hospital v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Johnson Radiological Group v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Nowlin v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pope v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Levit v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Levit v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Samantha P. Blair v. Victoria Hutchison, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API