Garza v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEYS, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 18 years in prison. We reform the judgment of the trial court to delete the restitution finding and affirm as reformed.
In his first five points of error, appellant contends that the trial court’s judgment, which set the amount of restitution at $4,500, is not supported by the evidence. The State concedes that the record is “clearly devoid of evidence to provide the required factual basis for the trial court’s determination of the amount of restitution.” Since the State concedes error, we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Tisdale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Haggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Ash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Fields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.