Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 11, 1843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Louisville City Court. Bawdy houses.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ewing

This is an indictment against Frederick, a free man of color, for keeping a disorderly house. The only specifications in the indictment are, that the evil persons invited to and frequenting his house, were there permitted to remain, “drinking, tippling and otherwise greatly misbehaving themselves.” On the trial, among other acts of disorder proven, it was proven that Emily McCune and other prostitutes, occupied the upper rooms of the defendant’s house, as his tenants, to which a flight of stairs ascended on the outside of the house, and the entry to the rooms was not through the lower rooms,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Blocker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Swan v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1864
  5. Harlow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API