Legal Opinion
Blocker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 22, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll
Eeversing.
Tbe grand jury of Daviess County, in November, 1911, returned against tbe appellant, Blocker, an indictment charging that be,
“In tbe county aforesaid, and witbin twelve months next before tbe finding of this indictment, and from that time up to and including tbe day of tbe finding of tbe indictment, did unlawfully suffer and permit Mattie Boswell, a common prostitute, to occupy a bouse owned or controlled by defendant, and being in tbe city of Owensboro, and on West Second Street, tbe exact location of which is to tbe grand jury unknown, and this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Frederick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
- Ross v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842
- Harlow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Hazlewood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Ernest Ablett v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Curd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Elkhorn Mining Corp. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917