Legal Opinion

Walters v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1907No. Civ. No. 359PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

This action was brought to recover $500, the amount of a deposit made by plaintiff with defendants, Baldwin and McCaw, real estate agents, on a contract for the purchase of a certain lot belonging to defendant Mitchell. Plaintiff recovered judgment, from which defendant Mitchell appeals on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. The $500 was paid March 26, 1904, and was acknowledged by a writing, which described the lot as being situate on the northeasterly comer of Spmee and Clay streets, fronting forty feet and two inches on Spruce street, by a depth of one hundred and seven feet and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Feltham v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Robben v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Ziebarth v. ManionWashington Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API