Legal Opinion
Continental National Bank v. Folsom
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 4, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Jurisdiction. Banks. Attachment. Bonds. Sórvice. Constitutional Law. Before Judge Van Epps. City Court of Atlanta. December Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Folsom sued the Continental National Bank and Campbell Wallace on an attachment bond, which is as follows:
“Georgia, Fulton County.
“We, the Continental National Bank, of New York, principal, and security, acknowledge ourselves bound unto L. B. Folsom in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, subject to the following conditions:
“That the said Continental National Bank, of New York, principal, is seeking an attachment against the said L. B. Folsom, which is now about to be sued out, returnable to the June term, 1881, city court of the city of Atlanta, district and county aforesaid.
*451“Now…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cooke v. . State National Bank of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Negress Sally Henry, by William Henry, Her Father and Next Friend v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Robinson v. . National Bank of NewberneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- New Orleans Nat. Banking Ass'n v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Irons v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Langdeau v. Republic National Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Commonwealth v. MekelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.