Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Duffy v. Lakefront Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1949No. 27239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action in quo warranto is brought originally in this court under authority of Ohio, ex rel., v. Railway Co., 53 Ohio St. 189, 41 N.E. 205, and State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty.Genl., v. Miami Conservancy Dist., 125 Ohio St. 201,180 N.E. 893, as to the remedy. The Attorney General of Ohio as relator seeks to oust the respondent, Lake-front East Fifty-Fifth Street Corporation, from that portion of its property (known as the Black property) which lies between the existing shore line of Lake Erie and the shore line as it existed in 1898. In brief the relator claims that the land between those…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. State v. Cleveland & Pittsburgh RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Burke v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Whyte v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Merrill v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Nordale v. WaxbergDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API