Lambert v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Alexandria in a proceeding by quo warranto. Judgment for the petitioner. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
This is a quo warranto proceeding, in which it was determined that the defendant in .error, Robert S. Barrett, and not the plaintiff in error, Urban S. Lambert, was entitled to the office of member of the common council from the first ward of the city of Alexandria, made vacant by the death of Hubert Snowden, who was elected a member of the common council at the regular election held on the second Tuesday in June,’ 1910.
On the 23rd day of April, 1912, the common council, acting under section 1015-e of the Code of 1904, elected Mr. Lambert to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Snowden. At the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Burch v. HardwickeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1878
- Mitchell v. WittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Andrews v. Roanoke Building Ass'n & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- White Oak Coal Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McConnell v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Continental Ins. Co. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- Avalon Assisted Living Facilities, Inc. v. ZagerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Hudson Motor Car Co. v. HertzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.