Legal Opinion
Hudson Motor Car Co. v. Hertz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1941No. Nos. 8913, 8914PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
We adopt the following accurate and comprehensive statement of the case made by our brother, HAMILTON, who dissents from the conclusion reached by the majority:
These are appeals by appellants, the Hudson Motor Car Company, and Motor Wheel Corporation from a joint judgment of $9,-522.55 on the verdict of a jury in separate actions instituted against each of them by the appellee, Gustav C. Hertz, administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of Lois Crane Hertz, deceased.
On April 13, 1938, appellee’s deceased was severely injured in an automobile accident while riding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- City of Richmond v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- Lewis' Adm'r v. GlennSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilson v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- McDaniel v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- McMahon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.