Legal Opinion

State v. Jubie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1999No. 75437; CA A103373Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P.J.

The State of Oregon appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence of defendant’s Intoxilyzer test result in this prosecution for driving under the influence. ORS 138.060(3). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

This case involves a situation where the operator of the test relied on another officer to perform the 15-minute observation period before the test was administered. The trial court ruled that the requirement of OAR 257-030-0070(2)1 had not been met. The trial court wrote in its order, “[w]e know that [defendant] took nothing by mouth and we know that he didn’t regurgitate or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McVayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. TynonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API