Legal Opinion

State v. McVay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 14, 1987No. 86-7032; CA A39293PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*314YOUNG, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence of the results of an Intoxilyzer test, because the test operator failed to observe defendant during the 15-minute pre-test period and there was no factual basis to enable the operator to “make certain” that the pre-test requirements had been met. We affirm.

Officer Nafziger arrested defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants. He took defendant to jail, where there was an Intoxilyzer for breath testing purposes. Nafziger did not have his operator’s checklist with him, and he asked the jailer to observe defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. McClaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BaldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Gildroy v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. FilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. State v. LessarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. TynonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API