Legal Opinion

Bufford v. Bradshaw

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

The moving parties herein, having obtained leave by court order to sue the receiver and his agent in this foreclosure action have recovered judgments in the Municipal Court for excessive rent charges. From these judgments the receiver has appealed to Appellate Term. Because of his special status, the receiver did not post a bond to stay execution pending appeal (1ST. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 159), and the movants as judgment creditors are hesitant to enforce the judgment by execution because such a move might be in contempt of court. They therefore request at this stage the following relief:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. St. Nicholas BankNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Glickman v. KirtlandCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  3. People v. Royal Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Euro-American Lodging Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Jamaica Savings Bank v. Florizal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cortland Laundry, Inc. v. Lakeside Nursing Home, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API