Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Call

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leon Sohwerzmann, Jr., J.

The question here presented arises rather frequently. The decedent entered into a contract to sell certain real property which she had specifically devised in a previously executed will. While the contract was still in an executory state, and before the contract purchasers were by its terms obliged to complete payment thereunder, the decedent died. Does the specific devisee succeed to the decedent’s interest under the contract?

EPTL 3-4.2 (formerly Decedent Estate Law, § 37) makes it clear that he does. It expressly provides that: ‘ ‘ An agreement made by a testator to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. BurgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. Wagstaff v. MarcyNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re the Estate of PrenticeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  5. Gaines v. WinthropNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JakubowiczNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  2. In re the Estate of LuciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API