Van Tassel v. Burger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submissiow of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Hooker, J.:
The testatrix of the defendant executor died seized of several pieces of real property; by her will site devised one of these pieces to the defendant Baynes. She gave to the plaintiff all of her personal property, except ■ certain earrings and her piano. During her life*510time the testatrix entered into a contract with one Hoffmann for the sale to him of the premises described in her will as devised- to the defendant Baynes for the sum of $5,000 ; the vendee paid $50 on account of the purchase price at the time of the - execution and delivery of the contract. On the 22d day of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheelwright v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Frost v. BeekmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Beekman v. FrostNew York Supreme Court · 1820
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- De Bow v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Alexander v. Quality Leather Goods Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1934
- Ferguson v. CasparDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Estate of RubinsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.