Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 30, 2019No. 3:19-cv-08010-JATUnknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jason Chisholm, No. CV-19-08010-PCT-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jason Chisolm’s (“Claimant”) appeal from the 16 denial of his application for social security disability benefits. The matter is fully briefed, 17 (Docs. 13-15), and the Court now rules on it. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 A. Disability Determination 20 To qualify for benefits, an applicant must first show he is “under a disability.” 42 21 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API