Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Secretary of Defense
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-2764PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPORKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Gilbert Ortiz and Nollie Plowman are two former soldiers who have brought this action to challenge the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) denying their' applications for upgrade of their discharges from “other than honorable” to “honorable”. The ABCMR denied plaintiffs’ applications because they were not filed within the time specified by statute and because plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that it was in the interest of justice to excuse their failure to file timely applications. This action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hodges v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Paul Lawrence Kendall v. Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Karl Ballenger v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. Nollie Plowman v. Secretary of Defense Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- McFarlane v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Marozsan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995