Legal Opinion

Turner v. Meridan Fire Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided March 9, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Law. Motion for a new trial,

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

On July 9, 1879, the defendant issued a policy of insurance to the plaintiff, running for five years. Afterwards, on Novem-*455Der 15,1880, the plaintiff took out another policy for five years, covering the same property, in the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company. The property was destroyed by fire March 8,1881. Both policies contained a provision that they should be void in case the insured “shall have or shall hereafter make any other insurance on the property,” without the written consent of the company. No notice was given of other insurance to either company, nor was the fact…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Ætna Fire Insurance v. TylerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  4. Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Northrup v. Mississippi Valley InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Thomas E. Basham Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  3. United States v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Commercial Union Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API