Legal Opinion

Pauly v. Pauly

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1997No. 96-1329PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue before this court is whether a parent paying child support under a shared parenting plan is entitled to an automatic credit for the time his children reside with him. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a parent is not entitled to an automatic credit.

R.C. 3113.215 sets forth the scheme a court must follow in calculating and ordering child support. Appellant argues that pursuant to R.C. 3113.215(C), he is entitled to an automatic credit in his child support payments for the time his children reside with him.

R.C. 3113.215(C) provides: “Except when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marker v. GrimmOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Blessing v. BlessingOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Morrow v. BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Pauly v. PaulyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jarvis v. Witter, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Hubin v. HubinOhio Supreme Court · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API