Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Becker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2013No. 2012-1674 and 2012-1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal comprises two cases: a discretionary appeal, case No. 2012-1674, and a certified conflict, case No. 2012-1898. The cases were consolidated, and the parties were requested to brief the following issue:

Whether company benefits, such as a company car, can be included as income for the purpose of child support calculation if the benefits the party receives do not come from self-employment, as proprietor of a business, or as a joint owner of a partnership or closely held corporation.

134 Ohio St.3d 1415, 2013-Ohio-158, 981 N.E.2d 883.

{¶ 2} In his discretionary appeal, appellant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Pauly v. PaulyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Morrow v. BeckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Spier v. Spier, Unpublished Decision (3-7-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westlake Civil Service Commission v. PietrickOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Link v. Wayne Ins. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. GillespieOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Cummins v. MinsterOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Seaquist v. DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API