Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Greaver

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Charlottesville in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

Defendant in error brought this action to recover damages of the Chesapeake and Ohio Bailway' Company for injuries resulting from the maintenance of a nuisance on the defendant’s property, and at the trial there was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $300, upon which the judgment to which this writ of error was awarded was rendered.

The law of this case is fully discussed and settled by this court in its opinion just handed down in the case of N. A. Terrell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., ante, p. 340, 66 S. E. 55, and we shall he content with a reference to that case and the authorities…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Terrell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  2. AES CORP. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  3. Town Crier, Inc. v. HumeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  4. Portner v. Portner's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Philip Greenberg, Inc. v. DunvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API