Legal Opinion

Latronica v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 1988No. 87-3043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint under the Structural Work Act (Act) (111. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) and denying leave to file an amended complaint. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Don M. Latronica, was employed by Caisson Corporation to operate a drill rig on property owned by Commonwealth Edison Company. Commonwealth Edison employed Edward Gray Corporation as a general contractor to undertake construction activity at the site involving the erection of tanks and buildings. Edward Gray Corporation employed the plaintiff’s employer, Caisson Corporation.

On December 5,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNellis v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Vuletich v. United States Steel Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Crafton v. Lester B. Knight & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Prange v. Kamar Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ralls v. Village of Glendale HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Pozzi v. McGee Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Dubrovich v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Ralls v. Village of Glendale HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API