Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 26, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 4708PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
The original complaint in this suit was filed by the plaintiffs, Roland T. Marshall (“Marshall”), Paul L. Carson (“Carson”) and Henry T. Jones (“Jones”), as black citizens against the defendant Electric Hose and Rubber Company (“Company”) charging that the Company maintained a policy, practice, custom or usage of discriminating against the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs’ class 1 because of their race or color. In addition, the plaintiffs charged that the defendants, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America Local 184 (“Local Union”) and United…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jack Gittlemacker v. Arthur T. Prasse, Commissioner of Prisons of Pa. And Frank C. Johnston, Warden, State Correctional Institution, Dallas, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- James P. Miller v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Negrich v. HohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morpurgo v. Bd. of Higher Ed. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Flesch v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric InstituteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Plummer v. Chicago Journeyman Plumbers' Local Union No. 130District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Foreman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Dan Archie v. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers And Warehouse Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.