Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-2127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The record consists of the complaint, the answer and a fact stipulation. 1 An order was entered on June 16, 1987 denying plaintiff’s motion because of the persistence of fact issues. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).
Conrail filed this declaratory judgment action to recover the amount it expended defending the Federal Employers’ Liability Act action of its employee John H. Lubbe, including payment of $165,600, representing its share of the jury’s verdict in his favor. 2 In November,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- American Contract Bridge League v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Public Service Mutual Insurance Company v. Lee CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Company Of South Carolina, LpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Golotrade Shipping & Chartering, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- P.I. & I. Motor Express, Inc. v. RLI Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019