School District No. 176 v. Sanford
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Can a school district of the third-class sell real estate otherwise than for cash?
This is the question to be answered in this case, which arises from the sustaining of the demurrer to the affirmative defense of the appellants, who are being sued in ejectment. The affirmative defense pleads that the voters of the plaintiff school district “did decide to and did authorize the board of directors of plaintiff to enter into a contract for the sale of said property,” and that thereafter, in pursuance of such election, the board of directors entered into a contract of purchase and sale.
Authority to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Meyer v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- O'Neill v. Yellowstone Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Washington-Oregon Corp. v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Singer Architectural Servs. Co. v. DoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977