Legal Opinion

Sango v. Parks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1913No. 2852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Action by Ellen Sango and others against Laura Parks and others, to cancel deeds to real estate. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This is an action begun in the district court of Muskogee county, on December 2, 1908, by Ed and Ellen Sango, husband and wife, against O. F. Parks, to cancel certain deeds to three separate quarter sections of land, the same originally being the allotments of Minnie, Rosa, and Lu-anna Sango, deceased minor children of said Ed and Ellen San-go. Since the commencement of this action Ed Sango, one of the plaintiffs, and O. F. Parks, the original defendant, have died and the cause has been revived and now proceeds in the name of Ellen Sango, Nettie Plerred, Priscilla…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Mateer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Cleaveland v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Bruner Et Ux. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Roberts v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamilton Twp. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Mitchell v. Guaranty State Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Tracy v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Canadian River R. v. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Kiefer Oil & Gas Co. v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API