Legal Opinion

Cleaveland v. Richardson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1889No. 125PublishedCited by 36 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the' Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, in September, 1881, by George C. Richardson, Charles S. Smith, George K. Guild, Ralph L. Cutter and Harrison Gardner, partners composing .the firm of .George C. Richardson & Co., against dames O. Cleaveland,- Cornelius B. Cummings, Charles W. Woodruff .and Washington…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the' Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, in September, 1881, by George C. Richardson, Charles S. Smith, George K. Guild, Ralph L. Cutter and Harrison Gardner, partners composing .the firm of .George C. Richardson & Co., against dames O. Cleaveland,- Cornelius B. Cummings, Charles W. Woodruff .and Washington Libbey, partners composing the firm of Cleaveland, Cummings & Woodruff. The declaration contained the money counts, and…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Blatchford,

after stating the case as above reported, delivered, the opinion of £he court.

It is contended for the plaintiffs that their assignment to Knickerbocker was not binding upon them, because the defendants did not disclose to them the financial standing of Libbey, nor the fact of his liability as a general partner in the •firm of Cleaveland, Cummings & Woodruff, nor the liability in regard to the debts of that firm assumed by him by the paper set forth in the fifth finding.

But the ninth finding sets forth fully what took place between Knickerbocker and the plaintiffs, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. LeffermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Columbus Hotel Corp. v. Hotel Management Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Fedders Corp. v. BoatrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Backus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API