Legal Opinion
(PC) Czechorowski v. Nieblas
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 28, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01027Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER CZECHOROWSKI, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01027-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 13 v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 14 T. NIEBLAS, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) 16 ) (ECF No. 9) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Christopher Czechorowski is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On August 25, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gregory Carey v. John E. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.