Legal Opinion

United States v. Harry Kaplan, and Annie Kaplan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1959No. 185, Docket 23750PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

By this action the Government asserted two claims, first seeking judgment against Harry Kaplan for $29,440.20, together wth penalties and interest, by reason of unpaid distilled spirits taxes on certain alcohol and mash seized in 1935; and, in event of award of judgment against Harry Kaplan on the tax claim, that four 1945 conveyances from Harry to his wife Annie be set aside as fraudulent.

The material facts are not in controversy and are best stated chronologically. On November 11, 1935, the Government seized certain alcohol and mash at a place known as Cannon Farm,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. 58th Street Plaza Theatre, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. United States v. Rangel-PerezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
  3. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Leslie H. Jockmus and Esther N. Jockmus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. St. MaryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API