Legal Opinion
Ambre v. Joe Madden Ford
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 4, 1995No. 94 C 4389PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COAR, District Judge.
On September 26, 1992, plaintiff Laurie Ambre (“Ambre”) purchased from defendant Joe Madden Ford (“Madden”) a “new” 1992 Ford Explorer manufactured by defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Ambre alleges that shortly after she purchased the Explorer, it manifested multiple defects which affected its safety, reliability and value. (lA.Compl., Count IV, at ¶¶5, 7). In Count IV of her amended complaint, Ambre advances a common law fraud claim against Madden and Ford. More specifically, she alleges that both defendants made the following false oral…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- L.S. Heath & Son, Inc. v. At & T Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bakalis v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 504District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. SimsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- West v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023