Legal Opinion · Dissent

Construction, Building Material, Ice & Coal, Laundry, Dry Cleaning, & Industrial Laundry & Dry Cleaning Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, Yardmen, Salesmen, & Allied Workers, Local 682 v. Bussen Quarries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1988No. 87-1431Published

1DissentHeaney, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. We are obligated to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 375 U.S. 261, 84 S.Ct. 401, 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964). That decision requires a reversal of the district court.

In Carey, a union (IUE) and an employer (Westinghouse) entered into a collective bargaining agreement covering employees at several plants. Pursuant to the agreement, Westinghouse recognized IUE and its locals as the exclusive bargaining representative of those units for which the IUE and its locals had been certified as the exclusive bargaining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Local Union 204 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Affiliated With the Afl-Cio v. Iowa Electric Light and Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Morello v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Ben Gutman Truck Service, Incorporated v. Teamsters Local No. 600Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API