Legal Opinion
The Ansaldo San Giorgio I
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The libelant was the owner of three lots of cherries carried by the claimant on its ship Ansaldo from Italian ports to New York and *580Philadelphia. It brought suit for damage to the cherries in transit, and prevailed on the merits. By the interlocutory decree the case was sent to a commissioner to ascertain and compute the damages. The commissioner took testimony and filed his report, finding the damages (inclusive of interest) at the figure of $26,006.99. The case is here on exceptions taken by the carrier.
1. The commissioner held that certain provisions in the bills…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Ansaldo San Giorgio I v. Rheinstrom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- The FerncliffDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- Federal Insurance v. Transconex, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
- The Ansaldo San Giorgio IDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935