Legal Opinion

Bowman & Bull Co. v. Linn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1917No. 11269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph P. Rafferty, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooke

Plaintiff in error, the Bowman & Bull Company, a corporation, recovered judgment in the municipal court of Chicago for $2184.39 against George R. Linn, doing business as George W. Linn & Son, defendant in error, in an action brought on a contract to recover damages caused by the refusal of defendant in error to accept a car-load of butter which he. had contracted to purchase from plaintiff in error. On appeal -to the Appellate Court the judgment of the municipal court was reversed without remanding. The Appellate Court made no finding of fact, and it must therefore be presumed that it found…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Importing & Trading Co. v. E. A. Bear & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cutler v. Gardiner Metal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  3. Riverside Coal Co. v. Elman Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API