Legal Opinion

Riverside Coal Co. v. Elman Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.

From the finding, it appears that the plaintiff is a wholesale dealer and importer of coal and other fuels, with its principal place of business in Worcester, Massachusetts; the defendant a retail dealer in coal, with a place of business in Hartford, Connecticut. January 29th, 1926, the plaintiff’s salesman called on the defendant at Hartford, and took from the defendant an oral order for two cars of Scotch coke. At that time, a strike in the anthracite coal fields of national proportions was in force, and it was not then known when the strike would be settled. It did, in fact, terminate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Norman Printers Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Sanders v. MunsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  4. Lloyd & Elliott, Inc. v. ParkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Bowman & Bull Co. v. LinnIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  2. Delaware Ex Rel. General Crushed Stone Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API