Legal Opinion

Felix Payan v. Warden

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-06297Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIX PAYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-06297-MEMF (RAO) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records 19 on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 21 the Report to which objections have been made. 22 The Report recommends the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Rosemere Neighborhood Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API