Legal Opinion

Shellhammer v. Caruthers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1936No. 2997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is by writ of error, but the parties will be referred to as appellants and appellee; the action was by appellee, J. L. Caruthers, against appellants Menard Shellhammer et al. to recover damages for the overflow of his land and to his growing crops. He pleaded two theories of recovery: (a) For a portion of his land he had a right of drainage across appellants’ land on allegations that his land was higher than appellants’ and that appellants interfered with his drainage by building an embankment on their land between his land and their land, (b) As to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nevitt v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mutual Inv. Corp. v. HaysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Walker v. Salt Flat Water Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Babbs v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lake Village Implement Company v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Blocher v. McArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Coleman v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Wilson v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API