Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2009No. 2009-CA-0567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. JONES, Judge.

hThe Appellant, the City of New Orleans (“the City”), seeks review of a judgment of the district court finding the City liable for damages arising out of a trip and fall accident and awarding Appellee, Diana Murphy damages. Concluding that the district court did not err, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

The material facts are not in dispute. The instant matter arises out of a trip and fall incident that occurred as Mrs. Murphy jaywalked across Decatur St. between the 600 and 601 blocks in Orleans Parish. While crossing Decatur St. and looking out for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Entrevia v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Pitre v. Louisiana Tech UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Oster v. Dept. of Transp. & DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. LeBlanc v. City of AbbevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2010
  4. Riley Leblanc v. City of AbbevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Vappie v. MaumusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API