Legal Opinion

Barrer v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2009No. 07-35414PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a credit card company violates the Truth in Lending Act when it fails to disclose potential risk factors that allow it to raise a cardholder’s Annual Percentage Rate.

I

A

Walter and Cheryl Barrer held a credit card account with Chase.1 The Barrers received and accepted the Cardmember Agreement (“the Agreement”) governing their relationship at the relevant time in late 2004. In February 2005, Chase mailed to the Barrers a Change in Terms Notice (“the Notice”), which purported to amend the terms of the Agreement, in particular to increase the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hauk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Edna Jackson v. Syd Grant, Belle G. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Rossman v. Fleet BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Rubio v. Capital One BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Langan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Cappetta v. GC SERVICES LTD. PARTNERSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  5. Brown v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API