Soul v. Keller
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a conflict of jurisdiction between the federal District Court, |in bankruptcy, and the municipal court of Cleveland, over the assets of the bankrupt held, when the bankruptcy intervened, by a receiver previously appointed by the municipal court.1
The facts, so far as immediately important, may thus be sufficiently stated:
On April 28,1926, Dworken and Bradley, as plaintiffs, obtained judgment in the municipal court against the present bankrupt, as defendant, for $1,333.66 and costs. On May 4th following, plaintiffs filed in the municipal court a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pickens v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Stephens v. . Meriden Britannia Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- In re Diamond's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Muffler v. Petticrew Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Wells v. CermakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Millers v. KasnettOhio Court of Appeals · 2015