Legal Opinion

Roy v. Monitor-Patriot Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1972No. 5780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action for libel is the same case reported in Roy v. Monitor-Patriot Co., 109 N.H. 441, 254 A.2d 832 (1969). Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that criminal conduct no *81matter how remote in time or place can never be irrelevant to a candidate’s fitness for office so as to bring the publication within the private sector not requiring the application of the “knowing falsehood or reckless disregard” requirements of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 11 L. Ed. 2d 686, 84 S. Ct. 710 (1964); Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 28 L. Ed.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Monitor Patriot Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hoyt v. HorstSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  4. Scontsas v. Citizens Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Gibbs v. PriorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomson v. CashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. Dally v. Orange County PublicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Barry v. HorneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API