Legal Opinion

Abrahim Fata v. Edwin Arcelly, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2026No. 5:26-cv-02185Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ABRAHIM FATA, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 26-2185 : EDWIN ARCELLY, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM HENRY, J. JUNE 25, 2026 Plaintiff Abrahim Fata commenced this pro se civil action against numerous Defendants, asserting that this case primarily arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3); and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1595. (See ECF No. 2 (“Compl.”)…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API