Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Penn

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1978No. NCM 77 1158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANGER, Judge:

Appellant was convicted by special court-martial of possessing marijuana on two occasions. A complete exposition of the facts is unnecessary, as appeal is predicated upon alleged errors committed during and after appellant’s presentence hearing.

INTRODUCTION OF NONJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT

Consonant with paragraph 75 d of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition) and Section 0117 of the Manual of the Judge Advocate General, the prosecution introduced in evidence appellant’s military records reflecting the imposition of nonjudicial punishment on four…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Piersall v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. United States v. SharperU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. HoustonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. KoekU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. ForesterU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API