Legal Opinion

Peterson v. City of Abbeville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 2008No. 1051802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Justice.

The City of Abbeville (“the City”) sued Billy Frank Peterson and Jim E. Ellis, Jr. (collectively referred to as “the defendants”), on September 19, 2003, alleging that the defendants had placed a mobile home on certain real property owned by Peterson in such a way that violated § 91.3A2 of Art. IX of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Abbeville, entitled “Special Provisions for Zoning and Subdivision.” The City sought an order requiring the defendants to relocate the mobile home on the property so as to comply with § 91.3A2.

On October 21, 2003, the defendants filed a motion…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Boligee v. Greene County Water & Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. E. Cent. Baldwin Cnty. Water, Sewer & Fire Prot. Auth. v. Town of SummerdaleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Amsted Rail Company Inc v. Bessemer, Alabama, City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  4. North Face Construction LLC v. Birmingham, Alabama, City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
  5. Town of Boligee v. Greene County Water & Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API