Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1986No. 20943PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Richard James Pierce was convicted of theft by securing and retaining stolen property. U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-408(1), as amended (Supp.1985). In January 1984, defendant bought an air compressor from his friends, Mark Ward and Mike Adams, who had stolen it. Defendant claims error because the trial court improperly (1) refused to dismiss the charge for lack of sufficient evidence; (2) refused to give a proffered jury instruction on testimony of accomplices; and (3) admitted evidence of other crimes (e.g., distribution of drugs). We reject defendant’s contentions and affirm his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. WulffensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BoydUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bruner v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API