Legal Opinion
Sargent v. Brunner Housing Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
The several plaintiffs ovn property along Laurel Drive in Stony Brook. In 1963 defendant Brunner Housing Corp. acted with reference to Laurel Drive to: change its grade, put in curbs and other incumbrances, offer to dedicate most of it to the Tovn of Brookhaven as a public highvay, and grant easements to the Long Island Lighting Company for poles and the like. Plaintiffs claim an easement over Laurel Drive vhich they vonld nov validate and enforce and use as a basis for obtaining damages from defendant Brunner for the activities noted.
The vhole of the property vith which we are concerned here…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of City of New York (E. 177th St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- People v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Nichols Copper Co. v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Nichols Copper Company v. ConnollyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sargent v. Brunner Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969