Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Lick Fish & Poultry, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1968No. Civ. 24444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

On September 10, 1963, plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on October 18, 1962, in a fish and poultry market. Plaintiff stated that her injuries were caused by the negligent conduct of defendant Luigi Sesto while acting within the scope of his employment by defendant Excelsior Fish and Poultry, which allegedly owned and operated the market. Defendant Excelsior’s liability was predicated upon a respondeat superior theory and, in addition, upon its independent negligence in maintaining an unsafe condition within its market. Also named as defendants were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Stockton Terminal & Eastern RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Liera v. Los Angeles Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Santa Catalina Island Co. v. Superior Court of Riverside Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McIntire v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Sullivan v. Terra Marketing of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API